THE SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT WORKPLACE
(PREVENTION, PROHIBITION AND REDRESSAL) ACT, 2013
Saturday, March 7, 2026
Thursday, April 17, 2025
THE WAQF (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2025
THE WAQF (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2025
- The Waqf Amendment Bill, 2025 (As Reported by the joint committee)
- FAQ on the Waqf Amendment Bill, 2025
- Key Provisions of the Waqf Amendment Bill, 2025
- Key Recommendation by the Joint Parliament Committee on the Waqf Amendment Bill, 2025
- Waqf Amendment Bill, 2025: A Comparative Global Analysis
- Key data on Waqf as per WAMSI
- Concerns raised by members
- JPC Report on Waqf Amendment Bill, 2025
- Official amendment moved by the government to the Waqf Amendment bill 2024
- The Waqf (Amendment) bill, 2025 (As passed by Lok Sabaha on 03.04.2025)
- The Musalman Wakf (Repeal) bill, 2025 (As passed by Lok Sabaha on 03.04.2025)
Monday, February 17, 2025
Chief Justice of India, Justice Sanjiv Khanna,
Justice Sanjiv Khanna,
Chief Justice of India
(DoB.) : 14-05-1960
Term of Office : (DoA) 18-01-2019 to (DoR) 13-05-2025
Justice Sanjiv Khanna is a prominent figure in the Indian judiciary, currently serving as the 51st Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India. His appointment to the Supreme Court took place on January 18, 2019, marking a significant milestone in his distinguished legal career.
In addition to his role as Chief Justice, Justice Khanna holds several important positions that reflect his commitment to enhancing the legal framework and access to justice in India. He serves as the Patron-in-Chief of the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA), an organization dedicated to providing free legal services to those in need and ensuring that justice is accessible to all citizens, particularly the marginalized and underprivileged sections of society.
Thursday, February 6, 2025
Thursday, December 26, 2024
Important Judgment - Validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators in public-private contract
08-11-2024
CENTRAL ORGANISATION FOR RAILWAY ELECTRIFICATION vs M/S ECI SPIC SMO MCML (JV) A JOINT VENTURE COMPANY
C.A. No. 9486-9487/2019 Validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators in public-private contract
Conclusion 56.
With these findings and observations, I summarise my conclusions as follows:
39I.
Dispute resolution through arbitration encompasses two independent yet interdependent principles: contractual freedom as party autonomy and statutory obligation as duty to constitute an independent arbitral tribunal.
II. Party autonomy in making of an arbitration agreement is an essential feature of arbitration. It commences with choosing themembers of the arbitral tribunal, extends to the procedure that would apply for its conduct, and concludes with the method by which an award could be challenged before a court. It is thus a brooding and guiding spirit of arbitration. Party autonomy is sufficiently incorporated in the Arbitration Act, along with a restraint on judicial intervention.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
